Searched on Google with the first line of a JAVA stack trace?

We can recommend more relevant solutions and speed up debugging when you paste your entire stack trace with the exception message. Try a sample exception.

Recommended solutions based on your search

Solutions on the web

via GitHub by austindoupnik
, 1 year ago
Unable to deduce type of thread from address 0x00007f034001a000 (expected type JavaThread, CompilerThread, ServiceThread, JvmtiAgentThread, or SurrogateLockerThread)
via GitHub by batasrki
, 9 months ago
Unable to deduce type of thread from address 0x00007faef401a800 (expected type JavaThread, CompilerThread, ServiceThread, JvmtiAgentThread, or SurrogateLockerThread)
via Stack Overflow by Nipun Talukdar
, 1 month ago
Unable to deduce type of thread from address 0x00007fb1f430f000 (expected type JavaThread, CompilerThread, ServiceThread, JvmtiAgentThread, or SurrogateLockerThread)
via tonaconsulting.com by Unknown author, 2 years ago
Unable to deduce type of thread from address 0x00007fc980001000 (expected type JavaThread, CompilerThread, ServiceThread, JvmtiAgentThread, or SurrogateLockerThread)
via GitHub by nskvortsov
, 2 years ago
Unable to deduce type of thread from address 0x00000000039ae800 (expected type JavaThread, CompilerThread, ServiceThread, JvmtiAgentThread, or SurrogateLockerThread)
via Google Groups by Callum Scott, 1 year ago
Unable to deduce type of thread from address 0x00007f41fc032000 (expected type JavaThread, CompilerThread, ServiceThread, JvmtiAgentThread, or SurrogateLockerThread)
java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to deduce type of thread from address 0x00007f034001a000 (expected type JavaThread, CompilerThread, ServiceThread, JvmtiAgentThread, or SurrogateLockerThread) at sun.jvm.hotspot.runtime.Threads.createJavaThreadWrapper(Threads.java:166) at sun.jvm.hotspot.runtime.Threads.first(Threads.java:150) at sun.jvm.hotspot.runtime.DeadlockDetector.createThreadTable(DeadlockDetector.java:149) at sun.jvm.hotspot.runtime.DeadlockDetector.print(DeadlockDetector.java:56) at sun.jvm.hotspot.runtime.DeadlockDetector.print(DeadlockDetector.java:39) at sun.jvm.hotspot.tools.StackTrace.run(StackTrace.java:62) at sun.jvm.hotspot.tools.StackTrace.run(StackTrace.java:45) at sun.jvm.hotspot.tools.JStack.run(JStack.java:66) at sun.jvm.hotspot.tools.Tool.startInternal(Tool.java:260) at sun.jvm.hotspot.tools.Tool.start(Tool.java:223) at sun.jvm.hotspot.tools.Tool.execute(Tool.java:118) at sun.jvm.hotspot.tools.JStack.main(JStack.java:92) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498) at sun.tools.jstack.JStack.runJStackTool(JStack.java:140) at sun.tools.jstack.JStack.main(JStack.java:106)Caused by: sun.jvm.hotspot.types.WrongTypeException: No suitable match for type of address 0x00007f034001a000 at sun.jvm.hotspot.runtime.InstanceConstructor.newWrongTypeException(InstanceConstructor.java:62) at sun.jvm.hotspot.runtime.VirtualConstructor.instantiateWrapperFor(VirtualConstructor.java:80) at sun.jvm.hotspot.runtime.Threads.createJavaThreadWrapper(Threads.java:162) ... 17 more