Searched on Google with the first line of a JAVA stack trace?

We can recommend more relevant solutions and speed up debugging when you paste your entire stack trace with the exception message. Try a sample exception.

Recommended solutions based on your search

Samebug tips

  1. ,

    My guess is there is some kind of static state in the code being tested or in the test itself, so the tests aren't isolated. Adding the test changes the test order. In any case, your best course of action is to use the debugger to see why the tests fail.

  2. ,

    Check your assert declaration and the method implementation with the condition.

Solutions on the web

via GitHub by hasancelik
, 1 year ago
No error should have been thrown, but ConsumeThread-2 completed error expected null, but was:<java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException: com.hazelcast.ringbuffer.StaleSequenceException: sequence:43046 is too small. The current headSequence is:43095 tailSequence is:43094>
via GitHub by hasancelik
, 2 years ago
No error should have been thrown, but ConsumeThread-2 completed error expected null, but was:<java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException: com.hazelcast.ringbuffer.StaleSequenceException: sequence:76334 is too small. The current headSequence is:76357>
via GitHub by hasancelik
, 2 years ago
No error should have been thrown, but ConsumeThread-2 completed error expected null, but was:<java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException: com.hazelcast.ringbuffer.StaleSequenceException: sequence:82927 is too small. The current headSequence is:82989>
via GitHub by hasancelik
, 1 year ago
No error should have been thrown, but ConsumeThread-1 completed error expected null, but was:<java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException: com.hazelcast.ringbuffer.StaleSequenceException: sequence:10 is too small. The current headSequence is:97 tailSequence is:96>
via GitHub by hasancelik
, 2 years ago
No error should have been thrown, but ConsumeThread-1 completed error expected null, but was:<java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException: com.hazelcast.ringbuffer.StaleSequenceException: sequence:82361 is too small. The current headSequence is:82386>
via GitHub by hasancelik
, 1 year ago
No error should have been thrown, but ConsumeThread-2 completed error expected null, but was:<com.hazelcast.ringbuffer.StaleSequenceException: sequence:384796 is too small and data store is disabled. The current headSequence is:384797 tailSequence is:384796>
java.lang.AssertionError: No error should have been thrown, but ConsumeThread-2 completed error expected null, but was:<java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException: com.hazelcast.ringbuffer.StaleSequenceException: sequence:43046 is too small. The current headSequence is:43095 tailSequence is:43094>	at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)	at org.junit.Assert.failNotNull(Assert.java:755)	at org.junit.Assert.assertNull(Assert.java:737)	at com.hazelcast.test.TestThread.assertSucceedsEventually(TestThread.java:62)	at com.hazelcast.ringbuffer.impl.RingbufferAddAllReadManyStressTest.test(RingbufferAddAllReadManyStressTest.java:105)	at com.hazelcast.ringbuffer.impl.RingbufferAddAllReadManyStressTest.whenShortTTLAndBigBuffer(RingbufferAddAllReadManyStressTest.java:79)