java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<Set(3)> but was:<Set()>, took 0.054 sec

Searched on Google with the first line of a JAVA stack trace?

We can recommend more relevant solutions and speed up debugging when you paste your entire stack trace with the exception message. Try a sample exception.

Recommended solutions based on your search

Solutions on the web

via GitHub by rbellamy
, 1 year ago
expected:<Set(3)> but was:<Set()>, took 0.054 sec
java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<Set(3)> but was:<Set()>, took 0.054 sec
at com.typesafe.slick.testkit.tests.JoinTest$$anonfun$testDiscriminatorCheck$2.apply(JoinTest.scala:347)
at slick.dbio.DBIOAction$$anonfun$map$1.apply(DBIOAction.scala:44)
at slick.dbio.DBIOAction$$anonfun$map$1.apply(DBIOAction.scala:44)
at slick.basic.BasicBackend$DatabaseDef$$anonfun$runInContext$1.apply(BasicBackend.scala:149)
at slick.basic.BasicBackend$DatabaseDef$$anonfun$runInContext$1.apply(BasicBackend.scala:149)
at scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$flatMap$1.apply(Future.scala:253)
at scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$flatMap$1.apply(Future.scala:251)
at scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.run(Promise.scala:32)
at scala.concurrent.impl.ExecutionContextImpl$AdaptedForkJoinTask.exec(ExecutionContextImpl.scala:121)
at scala.concurrent.forkjoin.ForkJoinTask.doExec(ForkJoinTask.java:260)
at scala.concurrent.forkjoin.ForkJoinPool$WorkQueue.runTask(ForkJoinPool.java:1339)
at scala.concurrent.forkjoin.ForkJoinPool.runWorker(ForkJoinPool.java:1979)
at scala.concurrent.forkjoin.ForkJoinWorkerThread.run(ForkJoinWorkerThread.java:107)

Users with the same issue

You are the first who have seen this exception. Write a tip to help other users and build your expert profile.

Know the solutions? Share your knowledge to help other developers to debug faster.