java.lang.AssertionError

If you like a tip written by other Samebug users, mark is as helpful! Marks help our algorithm provide you better solutions and also help other users.
tip

Check your pattern declaration or check your assert declaration.


rafael

You have a different solution? A short tip here would help you and many other users who saw this issue last week.

  • GitHub comment 8661#247952921
    via GitHub by hasancelik
    ,
  • GitHub comment 8661#244672849
    via GitHub by hasancelik
    ,
  • GitHub comment 8661#244937147
    via GitHub by hasancelik
    ,
  • GitHub comment 8661#249130614
    via GitHub by hasancelik
    ,
  • GitHub comment 8661#249571057
    via GitHub by hasancelik
    ,
  • GitHub comment 8661#250491137
    via GitHub by hasancelik
    ,
  • GitHub comment 8661#251051405
    via GitHub by hasancelik
    ,
  • GitHub comment 8661#252551856
    via GitHub by hasancelik
    ,
  • GitHub comment 8661#254199193
    via GitHub by hasancelik
    ,
  • GitHub comment 8661#257240078
    via GitHub by hasancelik
    ,
    • java.lang.AssertionError: Instances not in safe state! {[127.0.0.1]:15940=MIGRATION_ON_MASTER, [127.0.0.1]:15939=MIGRATION_ON_MASTER, [127.0.0.1]:15941=MIGRATION_ON_MASTER, [127.0.0.1]:15938=MIGRATION_LOCAL} at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88) at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:41) at com.hazelcast.test.HazelcastTestSupport.assertAllInSafeState(HazelcastTestSupport.java:614) at com.hazelcast.internal.partition.PartitionServiceSafetyCheckTest.assertSafe(PartitionServiceSafetyCheckTest.java:204) at com.hazelcast.internal.partition.PartitionServiceSafetyCheckTest.clusterShouldBeSafe_withSingleDataMember(PartitionServiceSafetyCheckTest.java:86)

    Users with the same issue

    WoNik
    2 times, last one,
    jf-ast
    13 times, last one,
    odd
    1 times, last one,
    bernardpaulus
    2 times, last one,
    raytest
    2 times, last one,
    95 more bugmates