java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject

This exception has no message.

Samebug tips0

There are no available Samebug tips for this exception. If you know how to solve this issue, help other users by writing a short tip.

Don't give up yet. Paste your full stack trace to get a solution.

Solutions on the web65

  • via GitHub by sattishv
    , 9 months ago
    This exception has no message.
  • via Google Groups by Arturo Borrero Gonzalez, 8 months ago
    This exception has no message.
  • via Google Groups by Morris Ford, 1 week ago
    This exception has no message.
  • Stack trace

    • java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:226) at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2082) at java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.poll(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:467) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.TaskQueue.poll(TaskQueue.java:86) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.TaskQueue.poll(TaskQueue.java:32) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1068) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1130) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.TaskThread$WrappingRunnable.run(TaskThread.java:61) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)

    Write tip

    You have a different solution? A short tip here would help you and many other users who saw this issue last week.

    Users with the same issue

    You’re the first here who have seen this exception.