java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject

This exception has no message.

Samebug tips0

There are no available Samebug tips for this exception. If you know how to solve this issue, help other users by writing a short tip.

Don't give up yet. Paste your full stack trace to get a solution.

Solutions on the web65

  • via GitHub by sattishv
    , 9 months ago
    This exception has no message.
  • via Google Groups by Arturo Borrero Gonzalez, 8 months ago
    This exception has no message.
  • via Google Groups by Morris Ford, 1 week ago
    This exception has no message.
  • Stack trace

    • java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:196) at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2116) at com.lmax.disruptor.BlockingWaitStrategy.waitFor(BlockingWaitStrategy.java:87) at com.lmax.disruptor.ProcessingSequenceBarrier.waitFor(ProcessingSequenceBarrier.java:54) at backtype.storm.utils.DisruptorQueue.consumeBatchWhenAvailable(DisruptorQueue.java:56) at backtype.storm.disruptor$consume_batch_when_available.invoke(disruptor.clj:62) at backtype.storm.daemon.executor$fn__4384$fn__4393$fn__4440.invoke(executor.clj:658) at backtype.storm.util$async_loop$fn__469.invoke(util.clj:396) at clojure.lang.AFn.run(AFn.java:24) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)

    Write tip

    You have a different solution? A short tip here would help you and many other users who saw this issue last week.

    Users with the same issue

    You’re the first here who have seen this exception.