com.hazelcast.core.HazelcastException

java.io.IOException: No available connection to address [10.1.50.168]:5701

Samebug tips0

We couldn't find tips for this exception.

Don't give up yet. Paste your full stack trace to get a solution.

Stack trace

  • com.hazelcast.core.HazelcastException: java.io.IOException: No available connection to address [10.1.50.168]:5701 at com.hazelcast.util.ExceptionUtil.peel(ExceptionUtil.java:73)[hazelcast-all-3.7.3.jar:3.7.3] at com.hazelcast.util.ExceptionUtil.peel(ExceptionUtil.java:63)[hazelcast-all-3.7.3.jar:3.7.3] at com.hazelcast.util.ExceptionUtil.peel(ExceptionUtil.java:52)[hazelcast-all-3.7.3.jar:3.7.3] at com.hazelcast.util.ExceptionUtil.rethrow(ExceptionUtil.java:83)[hazelcast-all-3.7.3.jar:3.7.3] at com.hazelcast.client.spi.ClientProxy.invokeOnPartition(ClientProxy.java:155)[hazelcast-all-3.7.3.jar:3.7.3] at com.hazelcast.client.spi.ClientProxy.invoke(ClientProxy.java:147)[hazelcast-all-3.7.3.jar:3.7.3] at com.hazelcast.client.proxy.ClientMapProxy.putInternal(ClientMapProxy.java:457)[hazelcast-all-3.7.3.jar:3.7.3] at com.hazelcast.client.proxy.ClientMapProxy.put(ClientMapProxy.java:451)[hazelcast-all-3.7.3.jar:3.7.3] at com.hazelcast.client.proxy.ClientMapProxy.put(ClientMapProxy.java:253)[hazelcast-all-3.7.3.jar:3.7.3] Caused by: java.io.IOException: No available connection to address [10.1.50.168]:5701 at com.hazelcast.client.spi.impl.ClientSmartInvocationServiceImpl.getOrTriggerConnect(ClientSmartInvocationServiceImpl.java:87)[hazelcast-all-3.7.3.jar:3.7.3] at com.hazelcast.client.spi.impl.ClientSmartInvocationServiceImpl.invokeOnPartitionOwner(ClientSmartInvocationServiceImpl.java:46)[hazelcast-all-3.7.3.jar:3.7.3] at com.hazelcast.client.spi.impl.ClientInvocation.invokeOnSelection(ClientInvocation.java:142)[hazelcast-all-3.7.3.jar:3.7.3] at com.hazelcast.client.spi.impl.ClientInvocation.invoke(ClientInvocation.java:122)[hazelcast-all-3.7.3.jar:3.7.3] at com.hazelcast.client.spi.impl.ClientInvocation.run(ClientInvocation.java:153)[hazelcast-all-3.7.3.jar:3.7.3] at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)[?:1.8.0_102] at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)[?:1.8.0_102] at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)[?:1.8.0_102] at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)[?:1.8.0_102] at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)[?:1.8.0_102] at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)[?:1.8.0_102] at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)[?:1.8.0_102] at com.hazelcast.util.executor.HazelcastManagedThread.executeRun(HazelcastManagedThread.java:76)[hazelcast-all-3.7.3.jar:3.7.3] at com.hazelcast.util.executor.HazelcastManagedThread.run(HazelcastManagedThread.java:92)[hazelcast-all-3.7.3.jar:3.7.3]

Write tip

You have a different solution? A short tip here would help you and many other users who saw this issue last week.

Users with the same issue

We couldn't find other users who have seen this exception.